EvoTARDs' Transparent Lunacy
-
Elizabeth Liddle has a blog entry in which she tries to argue that a sculptured statue (of David) refutes the claim that merely throwing stuff out created the statue and therefor refutes Gil Dodgen's claim that throwing stuff out isn't creative.
This is all in reference to natural selection, which is a result, basically eliminative and doesn't do anything.
Unfortunately none of the evoTARDs making and trying to support that argument will be testifying in any Court case involving the "theory" of evolution.
Just how fucking stupid and dishonest can people be to compare an agency intentionally designing something to a blind and mindless result?
It is obvious that Elizabeth is bitter over being dumped from Uncommon Descent and will just say anything in order to strike back. Too bad she just whiffs and strikes out.
Elizabeth Liddle has a blog entry in which she tries to argue that a sculptured statue (of David) refutes the claim that merely throwing stuff out created the statue and therefor refutes Gil Dodgen's claim that throwing stuff out isn't creative.
This is all in reference to natural selection, which is a result, basically eliminative and doesn't do anything.
Unfortunately none of the evoTARDs making and trying to support that argument will be testifying in any Court case involving the "theory" of evolution.
Just how fucking stupid and dishonest can people be to compare an agency intentionally designing something to a blind and mindless result?
It is obvious that Elizabeth is bitter over being dumped from Uncommon Descent and will just say anything in order to strike back. Too bad she just whiffs and strikes out.
posted by Joe G @ 8:45 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home