Evolutionists, Too Afraid To Lead By Example
-
Evolutionists are a cowardly lot. They love to run their mouths about ID saying that it doesn't have any positive evidence nor is it scientific. But when push comes to shove they cannot produce any positive evidence nor a testable hypothesis for their position!
What they say is it doesn't matter, ID should stand on its own. That is just more yellow-belly coward shit.
The reason we ask for positive evidence and a testable hypothesis for their position is so we know what they will accept and cannot keep retreating and flailing away. However it is obvious that they are chicken-shit cowards- losers of life and acientifically illiterate.
The sad part is they attack ID for attacking their position- not realizing that it is mandated to eliminate their position before attempting to infer design- but then they turn around and attack ID with their ignorance. That's right ignorance as the way to refute the design inference is to step up and actually produce positive evidence along with a testable hypothesis for their position!
What happens with that is morons like Kevin R. McCarthy of Round rock Texas saying his position is the cowardly position of "evolution"- McCarthy still thinks that ID is anti-evolution in the face of the overwhelming facts it is not.
Evolutionists are a cowardly lot. They love to run their mouths about ID saying that it doesn't have any positive evidence nor is it scientific. But when push comes to shove they cannot produce any positive evidence nor a testable hypothesis for their position!
What they say is it doesn't matter, ID should stand on its own. That is just more yellow-belly coward shit.
The reason we ask for positive evidence and a testable hypothesis for their position is so we know what they will accept and cannot keep retreating and flailing away. However it is obvious that they are chicken-shit cowards- losers of life and acientifically illiterate.
The sad part is they attack ID for attacking their position- not realizing that it is mandated to eliminate their position before attempting to infer design- but then they turn around and attack ID with their ignorance. That's right ignorance as the way to refute the design inference is to step up and actually produce positive evidence along with a testable hypothesis for their position!
What happens with that is morons like Kevin R. McCarthy of Round rock Texas saying his position is the cowardly position of "evolution"- McCarthy still thinks that ID is anti-evolution in the face of the overwhelming facts it is not.
posted by Joe G @ 7:58 AM
63 Comments:
At 11:16 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
Lenski.
At 11:59 AM,
Joe G said…
Lenski's experiments support baraminology, not the unscientific position of evolutionism:
What happens with that is morons like Kevin R. McCarthy of Round rock Texas or Richtard T Hughes, also of texas, saying his position is the cowardly position of "evolution"- McCarthy still thinks that ID is anti-evolution in the face of the overwhelming facts it is not.
At 12:27 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
Now now Joe, don't go fishing. You'd presumable be upset I posted my pictures of you.
At 12:46 PM,
Joe G said…
No fishing- Lenski's experiments support baraminology, you are a moron and you still can't support your position except to equivocate.
As for pictures of me- nope I wouldn't be upset. I would be surprised if you found one of me- not who you think is me.
At 2:41 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
So I have permission then?
At 2:52 PM,
Joe G said…
You have my permission to post any and all of Richard T. Hughes' personal information.
Shit, I will give myself permission to post your personal information.
At 2:54 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
No, Do I have your permission to post pictures of you, Joe. Its simple enough, not sure why you're making it harder than it needs to be. If you say "no", that's fine, but your hypocrisy will be there for all to see. It's entirely up to you.
At 3:57 PM,
Joe G said…
Richtard:
If you say "no", that's fine, but your hypocrisy will be there for all to see.
Explain this alleged "hypocrisy".
As for something for all to see, well here you are, again, with your head up your ass and still too afraid to lead by example.
And when you do dare provide an example it is an example of baraminology and then you protest in ignornace.
At 4:14 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
Can you give a straight answer? YES or NO?
At 4:36 PM,
Joe G said…
Explain this alleged "hypocrisy".
Still waiting...
At 4:38 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
Yes or No, Joe? At least I'm courteous enough to ask.
Are you stuck? If you answer 'Yes', will your "not really a hero, can't bench 300lbs' real image be there for all to see.
If you answer 'No', do you have a double standard, one for yourself and one for others?
At 4:42 PM,
Joe G said…
RichTard:
If you answer 'Yes', will your "not really a hero, can't bench 300lbs' real image be there for all to see.
So you don't have my P90X photos.
RichTard:
If you answer 'No', do you have a double standard, one for yourself and one for others?
No, why would there be a double-standard?
At 4:44 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
YES or NO, Joe. Its a simple question.
At 4:45 PM,
Joe G said…
Run the photo by me and I will answer you. All you have to do is post the link, I will check it and either approve or disapprove your comment.
At 4:50 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
That's not how it works. YES or NO. You don't ask to run things by other people before publishing them, so I don't see why I should.
YES or NO.
At 4:59 PM,
Joe G said…
That is how it works RichTard.
Take it or leave it.
At 5:05 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
So you're a hypocrite then, wanting one thing for yourself yet doing something different to others.
Thanks for clarifying. The pictures shall remain offline.
At 5:15 PM,
Joe G said…
Richtard:
So you're a hypocrite then, wanting one thing for yourself yet doing something different to others.
Any evidence to back that up? Or are you still stuck on bald assertions and false accusations?
At 5:20 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
The evidence is your actions, Joe.
At 5:27 PM,
Joe G said…
IOW you are full of shit, as usual.
And when you find one thing I have done to evotards that wasn't done to me first by evotards, well you will be the first to do so.
So thanks- your actions speak volumes.
At 5:39 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
Someone did something bad once to you so you now have a mandate to do what you want to others?
Do you think each individual should be treated on their own merits, or is it better to form stereotypes based on things like opinions, gender, colour of skin?
At 5:45 PM,
Joe G said…
Richtard:
Someone did something bad once to you ...
More than once and more than one evotard.
... so you now have a mandate to do what you want to others?
Except I don't do what I want.
Do you think each individual should be treated on their own merits,
I treat everyone on their own merits. Sometimes I just choose the treatment evotards used- and not even close to the level used against me.
At 5:46 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
So how do you validate posting personal information about those who didn't do such things to you?
At 5:52 PM,
Joe G said…
I need more than vague accusations.
Each case is different. I would have to know what I posted. But you don't dare go there...
At 9:43 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
Take for example Hermagoras. You posted his real name, where he works, the area he lives, evebntalked about visiting with 'your boys'. He clearly didn't want this, but you did it anyway. Did you ask him first, like I'm asking you?
At 9:54 AM,
Joe G said…
RichTard:
Take for example Hermagoras.
Yup he is a piece of shit liar.
RichTard:
You posted his real name,
Yup I expose liars.
where he works,
Yup I expose liars.
the area he lives, evebntalked about visiting with 'your boys'.
Liar. I said I could have visited him.
He clearly didn't want this, but you did it anyway.
I didn't want his lies and actually told him to stop- he didn't, so he got what he deserved.
But anyway Richtard I will be coming your way soon enough. We can clear it all up then.
At 9:56 AM,
Joe G said…
And BTW everything I found out about Kellogg was super easy meaning that he should be more careful about the shit he spews.
As for me I welcome some asshole evotard to come my way...
At 10:01 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
"And BTW everything I found out about Kellogg was super easy meaning that he should be more careful about the shit he spews.
As for me I welcome some asshole evotard to come my way..."
This doesn't address what I wrote, or your hypocrisy. And no-one is buying that you're some big scary guy, Joe. Have a look in the mirror - that's the real you.
At 10:22 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
You've been caught lying multiple times 'parkinglot Joe / Jim / John' - does that mean it's okay to post your pictures online?
At 12:16 PM,
Joe G said…
Richtard:
You've been caught lying multiple times
Your false accusations and unsupported bullshit means nothing to me.
At 12:19 PM,
Joe G said…
RichTard:
This doesn't address what I wrote, or your hypocrisy.
What hypocrisy? And I addressed what you wrote.
Richtard:
And no-one is buying that you're some big scary guy, Joe.
I am only 6' 210 lbs. But I am sure I can kick your ass.
RichTard:
Have a look in the mirror - that's the real you.
I see someone a bit over 6' tall weighing 210 lbs, with an upper body of over 48", a waist just over 36" and hips just under 36".
At 12:24 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
"I see someone a bit over 6' tall weighing 210 lbs, with an upper body of over 48", a waist just over 36" and hips just under 36"."
Doesn't look like your benching 300lbs to me, Joe. Not even close. And where should I ask for you again in the empty parkinglot, you documented liar?
So, can I post the pics? YES or NO.
At 12:28 PM,
Joe G said…
RichTard:
Doesn't look like your benching 300lbs to me, Joe.
You don't know anything, RichTard.
Tell us what you know about the subject of weight-lifting, RichTard. I have 5 seconds to spare so I have more than enough time for you to tell me everything you know about it.
RichTard:
And where should I ask for you again in the empty parkinglot, you documented liar?
Your lies and false accusations are meaningless asshole.
So perhaps when you stop with your lies and nonsense we can actually talk science or even address your fantasy issues you have for me.
At 1:56 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
Don't get pissy Joe. I'm simply confronting you with your own hypocrisy - one rule for you, another for everyone else. The fact we're thirtysomething replies in and you still wont answer a very simple, very direct yes or no question sums you up perfectly.
At 4:30 PM,
Joe G said…
And I am STILL waiting to hear about this alleged hypocrisy.
Evotards went much further than I ever have, so it isn't as you say. Not only that you have only imagined I have lied. And the allged "lies" have nothing to do with other people and they have nothing to do with your lame-ass position.
And yes it is very notieable that we are thirty-something comments in and you are too afraid to lead by example by producing scientific evidence that supports your position.
And it is also very noticeable that you are a stalker-troll, as the bulk of your posts also prove.
At 8:51 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
"And it is also very noticeable that you are a stalker-troll,"
A stalker-troll would presumably go looking for personal details about folks on the internet. There's no escaping your hypocrisy, Joe.
At 9:04 AM,
Joe G said…
Richtard:
A stalker-troll would presumably go looking for personal details about folks on the internet.
Not necessarily, but you have done that also.
At 9:14 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
You're such a hypocrite. Making you face that has been fun. Perhaps you'll remember the golden rule in the future.
I'll keep your pics off line.
At 9:26 AM,
Joe G said…
You're such a piece-of-shit liar who couldn't support its bald assertions if its life depended on it.
It has been fun watching you squirm away from trying to support your position.
At 9:45 AM,
Joe G said…
RichTard Hughes, stalker troll:
3. Stalker troll. It takes a fairly sick mentality to want to be a troll. If you were in any way healthy, you would prefer to hang out the blogs of people you agree with, rather than maliciously setting out to disrupt those of people you hate. Stalker troll is the sickest of the lot. He becomes obsessed with every last detail of life of the person whose blog he infests, in the hope of gleaning titbits which he can use against his nemesis.
At 10:01 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
I post in lots of forums, Joe. Most of the ID ones suppres dissent with heavy moderation, so I can't post there. You've posted at AtBC, using someone else's picture as your avatar:
"Stalker troll. It takes a fairly sick mentality to want to be a troll. If you were in any way healthy, you would prefer to hang out the blogs of people you agree with, rather than maliciously setting out to disrupt those of people you hate. Stalker troll is the sickest of the lot. He becomes obsessed with every last detail of life of the person whose blog he infests, in the hope of gleaning titbits which he can use against his nemesis."
Everything you do highlights what a hypocrite you are.
You can't be very bright. If you were, you might think, "hey, did I ever do this?" before posting..
At 10:50 AM,
Joe G said…
Richtard- you don't have any dissent, just ignorant spewage. That is why you get suppressed. Real dissent would come in the form of actually supporting the claims of your position.
Richtard:
You've posted at AtBC, using someone else's picture as your avatar
Dude you posted for years using an actor's picture as your avatar- ie someone else's picture. IOW YOU are a hypocrite.
And BTW I have not infested someone's blog and looked for weaknesses I can use against them.
IOW once again you prove that you are nothing but a piece-of-shit moron.
At 10:52 AM,
Joe G said…
And here we are 40-something commenst in and Richtard the hypocrite asshole is still proving the OP to be true.
At 10:57 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
"Dude you posted for years using an actor's picture as your avatar-"
Well, a very well known comedic character. And I never posted on fora where he was a regular member, for the express purpose of trolling.
Joe, if you don't like what you see when I hold up the mirror, STOP BEING A PRICK. You have it in you, to stop at any time. It's not the mirrors fault.
At 11:16 AM,
Joe G said…
Once again you have it all ass backwards.
YOU are the PRICK, Richtard. YOU are the liar who goes around falsely accussing people and never supporting those accusations. YOU are the one who can't stand it when I use evotard tactics against them.
As for the mirror- that is YOU in the fucking mirror you are holding up- well perhaps you can also see your butt-buddy behind you.
At 11:25 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
Joe, I'm asking for permission, something you've never done.
Reflect, on that ugly image you see in the mirror. Hypocrite.
At 11:46 AM,
Joe G said…
I don't see you in the mirror, Rich. So I cannot reflect upon your ugly image.
And if you don't run the picture(s) by me then how do I know they are of me, meaning I can't give you permission if I ain't in the picture(s), moron.
At 12:10 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
I have pictures of you. You get to see them at the same time as everyone else. Can I post them? Don't be scared, or a hypocrite.
At 1:35 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
Joe, did you ask OgreMkV's permission before using his image?
At 2:33 PM,
Joe G said…
Rich, did you ask Sasha for permission before using his image?
OgreMKV put his image on the internet. All I did was link to it.
At 2:34 PM,
Joe G said…
RichTard:
I have pictures of you.
I have no reason to believe you.
At 2:39 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
so using a well know comedic character, is the same as using the image of someone you're Internet stalking, disclosing they're place of residence and employment? I don't know, nor care of SBC's residence or workplace.
Your frankly pathetic special pleading just highlights what an ugly, ugly person you are. As do your pictures, actually.
At 2:43 PM,
Joe G said…
Hey dickhead- Kevin was stalking me as evidenced by his blogs and posts on atbc. ALL you you evotards are guilty as charged.
As for disclosing their place of work and residence- again that was easily obtainable- Kevin's just by following links HE provides- and again everything I have done is in the face of THEIR attacks and lies. And I have not even done anything close to what has been done to me.
So again you are the hypocrite piece-of-shit here.
At 2:46 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
"Kevin was stalking me as evidenced by his blogs and posts on atbc" - Oh, what did he post about you?
HYPOCRITE.
At 3:14 PM,
Joe G said…
Richtard- you're the biggest hypocrite, ever.
But as I said seeing that you have some infatuation with me I can swing by on my way to Round Rock.
At 3:17 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
Oh, what did he post about you?
You can visit wherever you want, cupcake.
HYPOCRITE.
And Joe, you really not scary at all. quite sad really. But not scary.
At 3:22 PM,
Joe G said…
Richtard, stop acting like an asshole. Everyone knows it ain't an act.
And I am glad you don't find me scary- I take it that you don't mind if I stop by.
At 3:25 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
[Joespasm] THATS NOT ME THATS MY DAD!!!!!1111 [/Joespasm]
Joe, go where you will. You're a danger to no-one but yourself, you pathetic old coot.
At 4:17 PM,
Joe G said…
Joe to Stalker Troll-
close your eyes and click your heels together (we can safely just assume you are wearing ruby shoes) and keep saying that.
Strange how RichTard never supported any of his claims and was once again forced to derail a thread because he is also a fucking lowlife coward. Typical of evotards, can't face the facts so attack, attack, attack.
At 4:26 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
See you later, hypocrite.
Apologies to the many other commentators for the 'derailing'
LOL@JOEFAIL.
At 6:15 PM,
Joe G said…
Don't let the door hit you in the ass, loser....
At 6:53 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
LOL@JOESTARDGASM.
Great stuff!
*applause*
Great brithday present for OGREMKIV
At 8:32 PM,
Joe G said…
Great stuff, indeed.
Thank you for continuing to prove that evotards are dumber than shit.
Comedy gold...
Post a Comment
<< Home