Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

The "Its too complex" argument

-
Evotards are fond of saying that ID claims that "it's too complex to have evolved".

And that is after thousands of times telling them ID doesn't claim that as ID is not about mere complexity and ID is not anti-evolution.

But all that is besides the point.

The point being is the evotards use that- "it's too complex" argument.

For example-

1- The need for a RNA World is because DNA is too complex to have come first

2- The need for endosymbiosis for the origin of eukaryotes is because eukaryotes are too complex to have come first

3- Darwin's point was that the observed complexity had to have arisen gradually- too complex to have come first

Too funny..

2 Comments:

  • At 1:55 PM, Blogger TFT said…

    And that is after thousands of times telling them ID doesn't claim that as ID is not about mere complexity and ID is not anti-evolution.


    What does ID claim? We don't care what it doesn't claim. What are you claiming?

     
  • At 4:13 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    I take it staying on-topic is just too difficult.

    OK I will start a thread addressing your question- but if you have to ask...

     

Post a Comment

<< Home