blipey the clueless clown hits a new low of stupidity
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the only way you know that pattern was "specified" in your example is because you examined it before hand.
Now, ID says you cannot examine the designer before hand. So, that's right out. That means the random drawing and the abstract text could both be the desired pattern. Without looking at them first, there is no way to tell.
So, without looking at the pattern first to see what it is, how do we know it is specified?
blipey thinks that science is done psychically.
Totally unbelieveable. Science works by examining the data and evidence. The explanatory filter mandates a thorough investigation before a design inference can be reached (which is probably why evolutionitwits hate it).
Go back to being a clown and leave the science and investigations to people who know how to conduct them.