Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Wednesday, November 25, 2020

Wikipedia is Promoting a Lie


Wikipedia is promoting a lie. Big surprise. Judge Jones bio:

He is best known for his presiding role in the landmark Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District case, in which the teaching of "intelligent design" in public school science classes was ruled to be unconstitutional. 

Except no one was trying to teach intelligent design in public school science classes. What the fuck is wrong with people? All the school board wanted was a factual statement be read to the science classes. There wasn't any teaching of anything. The students were left to do their own research, if they wanted to. Yes, a pro-ID book was provided but at no expense to the school. But evos know that any challenge to their bullshit and their bullshit gets flushed.

And the sad part about the trial was that the judge was fooled by the lies and bluffs of the plaintiffs. Scientists have gone over the material and found that Ken Miller lied and the lawyers threw down a literature bluff- yes, all the material was checked and it didn't have any support for the alleged evolution of the immune system via natural selection and drift. Miller lied about blood clotting.

But why do evos insist on promoting that lie? Are they really that desperate? Or is it ignorance?


  • At 4:42 PM, Blogger William Spearshake said…

    Yes, a free scientific creationism book was being provided.

  • At 11:35 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Wrong again, assface.

  • At 7:47 PM, Blogger William Spearshake said…

    Sorry, Joe. Find-and-replace doesn’t change the nature of the book.

  • At 9:00 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Yes, you are sorry. But that is moot as the issue is the blatant lying about teaching Intelligent Design in the classroom.

    That said, discussing ID is biology classrooms is allowed in local school districts. No one is whining. No one is taking anyone to Court. And the kids are still learning biology.

  • At 9:00 PM, Blogger William Spearshake said…

    Sorry Joe, I’m Canadian. We don’t discuss religion in science classes. We save that for comparative religion classes.

  • At 8:09 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Yes, you are sorry as ID isn't religion. Only willfully ignorant assholes conflate ID with religion. There isn't any definition of religion that fits ID.

    But that is moot as you don't even know what science entails. You definitely cannot show how evolutionism meets the definition of science.

    Kids here are finding out there isn't any scientific alternative to ID.

  • At 11:22 AM, Blogger William Spearshake said…

    Ah, Joe. Still delusional. Creationism is a religious concept. Scientific Creationism was an attempt to lend scientific credibility to creationism. When that failed the did a find and replace, changing scientific creationism to Intelligent Design, and Creator to Agent. The evidence is there for all to see.

  • At 12:31 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Yes, you are delusional, and a pathological liar. ID predates Creation, dipshit. That evidence is there for all to see.

    ID is not Creation. Only desperate losers conflate the two.

    Evolutionism is an untestable and nonsensical concept. It doesn't belong in schools.


Post a Comment

<< Home