Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Joe Felsenstein, Proud to be an Ignorant Lard Butt

Joe Felsenstein is supposed to be one of the brighter lights of evolutionism. Unfortunately every time he tries to take on ID he proves to be a complete ignoramus. In a thread Joe F started he adds this bit of ignorance:

(CSI is only present if one has already ruled out chance or mechanical necessity). 
WRONG! CSI exists regardless of how it arose. The point of CSI is that every time we have observed it and knew the cause it has always been via some intelligent agency. ALWAYS, 100% of the time. And we have never observed nature, operating freely producing anything like it. NEVER.

That is why when we observe CSI and don't know the cause we can safely infer it was via an intelligent agency.

There isn't anything written by an IDist that says CSI only exists once we have ruled out necessity and chance. Evolutionists are proud to be ignorant assholes.

ETA- The claim of Intelligent Design is that only intelligent agencies can produce CSI.  Wm. Dembski says that he has proven that necessity and chance cannot produce CSI ("No Free Lunch"). That means if someone can demonstrate otherwise a main claim of ID falls.



  • At 6:29 PM, Blogger William Spearshake said…

    "The point of CSI is that every time we have observed it and knew the cause it has always been via some intelligent agency. ALWAYS, 100% of the time"

    Joe, I will word my response using words that you will understand. Are you so batshit crazy insane that you don't see the fucking stupidity in your Room temperature IQ ignorant statement?

  • At 8:16 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    The room must be about 150 degrees. But anyway, make your case, if you can.

  • At 12:14 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    You have an IQ of 150, Joe?

  • At 12:26 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    That's what the tests said. I even had an evo- Robert Rapier- challenge me, we both took the same test and both scored close- 149 to 151. He said the test was correct because he knew he had an IQ of 150. However he sed that I musta taken the test multiple times to get my score.

    It never fails- prove the assholes wrong and they have to try to change it somehow. LoL!

  • At 7:41 PM, Blogger oleg said…

    Joe took the test 3 times, scoring 50 each time, for a total of 150.

  • At 9:45 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    LoL! oleg would have had to take the test 15 times to get 150

  • At 10:17 PM, Blogger William Spearshake said…

    Joe, you have been behaving yourself on UD lately. Why is that?

  • At 5:49 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    I have?


Post a Comment

<< Home