EvoTards are making some strange and unsupported claims these days. First they tell me that I am presenting a strawman version of the theory of evolution. Yet when I provide the references that support my position- references from respected evolutionary biologists- they run away.
Now I have OM caught in the following nonsense:
I had asked:
Are you saying Ogre holds a position that is contrary to the theory of evolution? (because I claim OgreMKV holds to the theory of evolution)
OM sez:
No, he holds a position that is contrary to the one that you claim he holds.
My claim is that he holds to the current theory of evolution which posits divergence due to different accumulations of genetic accidents.
In your previous post you quoted Ogre:
ReplyDeleteWell, his version of evolution that actually has no relationship with any real version or theory of evolution.
So how can your version of evolution and his version of evolution be the same if Ogre himself says they are not the same?
Do you know his mind better then him?
Ogre:
ReplyDeleteWell, his version of evolution that actually has no relationship with any real version or theory of evolution.
OM:
So how can your version of evolution and his version of evolution be the same if Ogre himself says they are not the same?
Ogre is a lying piece of shit. I take it you failed to notice that he didn't support his claim and I have.
Joe,
ReplyDeleteIf all you say is true why is it that everybody who has expressed an opinion as said that you lost the debate, such as it was?
OM:
ReplyDeleteIf all you say is true why is it that everybody who has expressed an opinion as said that you lost the debate, such as it was?
Yet is is very noticeable that those who say I lost the debate cannot support that position. Also it is very noticeable that you cannot support your claim.