Just when you thought it couldn't get any better, I give you Thorton, the amazing EvoTard and its incredible math/ information formulation:
tardtard had sed:
I start with a gene of length 32 base pairs. I give it to IDCer One and he uses your formula for determining CSI from the number of base pairs as 5 bits
The gene then undergoes a duplication event to length 64 base pairs. I give it to IDCer Two and he uses your formula for determining CSI from the number of base pairs. He gets a CSI value of 6 bits, or one bit larger than IDCer One's case.
I didn't understand that as each nucleotide = 2 bits. 4 possible nucleotides = 2^2 = 2 bits. So, to me, a gene with 32 base pairs would have the information carrying capacity of 64 bits.
Back to tardtard. So I asked it about its math. tardtard responded with:
2^5 = 32, 2^6=64
That is so wrong it is pathetic. tardtard is proud to be an ignorant piece of shit liar.
So according to thorton if I have 32 bits of information and someone gives me 32 more bits of information, I only have 6 bits of information.
Thanks for the continued entertainment thorton. Now I understand why you won't support your position.
There you go with the evotard crap again, even though you say that ID has no problem with evolution. Make up your mind Joe. Oh wait, you don't have a mind.
ReplyDeleteDo you have any idea of how foolish, dishonest, and contradictory you look? Apparently not.
I explained the use of "evotard".
ReplyDeleteApparently you are too stupid to understand it.
Also that you think I am foolish, dishonest and contradictory, that doesn't mean anything to anyone as you are a proven piece of shit liar.