Nick Matzke is Still an Equivocating Coward
-
Nick Matzke is a putz, a loser and a grand equivocator. He has co-authored a recent article titled Evolution or intelligent design? Except Intelligent Design is NOT and never has been, anti-evolution. Nick equivocates any and all things "evolution" with blind watchmaker evolution.
Nick is now in New Zealand spreading hos brand of cowardly lies.
Read the article. Notice that it has absolutely NOTHING to do with blind watchmaker evolution's ability to produce anything. It doesn't offer up anything beyond question-begging and arguments from ignorance.
It's as if Nick Matzke is proud to be an equivocating ass.
Nick Matzke is a putz, a loser and a grand equivocator. He has co-authored a recent article titled Evolution or intelligent design? Except Intelligent Design is NOT and never has been, anti-evolution. Nick equivocates any and all things "evolution" with blind watchmaker evolution.
Nick is now in New Zealand spreading hos brand of cowardly lies.
Read the article. Notice that it has absolutely NOTHING to do with blind watchmaker evolution's ability to produce anything. It doesn't offer up anything beyond question-begging and arguments from ignorance.
Although the bacterial injectisome (right) has a completely different function to the flagellar motor (left) they both contain nine proteins that are highly structurally and functionally related, which makes it likely that they evolved from common ancestors.Moar equivocation and the denial of a COMMON DESIGN to explain the similarities. What they do NOT have is any methodology to test the claim that blind watchmaker evolution produced either of those structures.
It's as if Nick Matzke is proud to be an equivocating ass.
2 Comments:
At 9:55 PM, Eugen said…
Is Nick a person who was supposed to explain evolution to professor James Tour?
At 9:58 PM, Joe G said…
Something about macroevolution over a beer- or something like that. Unfortunately Nick is too busy inventing windmills to tilt at.
Post a Comment
<< Home