Pathetic Ignorance on Peaceful Science
-
I couldn't make this shit up if I tried- Peaceful and ignorance whining
So, that means evolutionism posits "numerous, successive, slight modifications". And that puts the onus on evos to support their claims.
ID does NOT make such a claim so clearly ID does not have to support it.
I couldn't make this shit up if I tried- Peaceful and ignorance whining
I’m more concerned with the blatant hypocrisy of demanding infinite detail for evolutionary histories from science while making zero similar demands from the ID-Creationist camp.It started with Charles Darwin:
"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down." [Darwin 1859, pg. 175]
So, that means evolutionism posits "numerous, successive, slight modifications". And that puts the onus on evos to support their claims.
ID does NOT make such a claim so clearly ID does not have to support it.
Ultimately, scientific ideas must not only be testable, but must actually be tested — preferably with many different lines of evidence by many different people. This characteristic is at the heart of all science.- UC BerkeleyThis has been pointed out to that whining scumbag and many occasions. Clearly Horton is just a pathetic lying coward who couldn't grasp science if its sad life depended on it.
posted by Joe G @ 11:59 AM
6 Comments:
At 4:52 PM,
JV said…
ID does NOT make such a claim so clearly ID does not have to support it.
ID tends to avoid making claims it can be called on. But you are claiming that there is a 'built-in' mechanism for directing evolution.
So . . . where is it? Provide the physical evidence.
You made a claim now you have to support it.
If there is no guiding mechanism then all evolutionary transitions are unguided. So it matters.
Can you support your claim? Yes or no?
At 5:14 PM,
Joe G said…
LoL! Codes- codes do not write themselves, run themselves and definitely they do not make the machinery required to carry them out.
The evidence for "built-in mechanisms" was provided by Drs Lee Spetner and James Shapiro.
Unguided processes can't even produce replicating RNA's. You don't have a mechanism capable of producing the much needed RNA world. Yours is a non-starter.
At 2:07 AM,
JV said…
LoL! Codes- codes do not write themselves, run themselves and definitely they do not make the machinery required to carry them out.
As has been noted before, there is some evidence that DNA may not be a pure code.
The evidence for "built-in mechanisms" was provided by Drs Lee Spetner and James Shapiro.
They did not provide physical evidence. If you can't provide physical evidence then there is no guidance.
Unguided processes can't even produce replicating RNA's. You don't have a mechanism capable of producing the much needed RNA world. Yours is a non-starter.
If you can't provide physical evidence which you claim exists then your hypothesis is dead.
At 9:07 AM,
Joe G said…
DNA isn't the code you ignorant ass. And there are more codes than the genetic code.
And yes, they did provide the evidence. Your ignorance is just that.
And you cannot demonstrate anything beyond your ignorance.
At 4:51 PM,
JV said…
DNA isn't the code you ignorant ass. And there are more codes than the genetic code.
Oh well, do elucidate then.
And yes, they did provide the evidence. Your ignorance is just that.
No, they made arguments. They did not provide physical or experimental evidence.
And you cannot demonstrate anything beyond your ignorance.
Please demonstrate where the mechanism that affects mutations exists and how it affects mutations.
At 6:11 PM,
Joe G said…
LoL! Your side doesn't have any evidence- experimental or otherwise. The evidence for directed mutations has been presented.
Post a Comment
<< Home