Joshua Swamidass is Scientifically Illiterate
-
Joshua Swamidass is either a liar, very stupid or just plain ignorant. Joshua posted the following bit of ignorance:
Reality dictates that in the absence of direct observation or designer input, the ONLY possible way to make any scientific determination about the designer or the processes used, is by studying the design and all relevant evidence.
Cleary Joshua has never ran an investigation to the root cause of something.
Joshua sez he knows all about ID. And yet he is totally ignorant of the following:
Joshua Swamidass is either a liar, very stupid or just plain ignorant. Joshua posted the following bit of ignorance:
The innovation of ID, however, is to consider design without considering a designer, but that doesn’t work in science. That’s the problem in the end.Wow. We don't even consider the designer until AFTER intelligent design has been determined to exist. So clearly it works in science as that is how it is done, 100% of then time.
Reality dictates that in the absence of direct observation or designer input, the ONLY possible way to make any scientific determination about the designer or the processes used, is by studying the design and all relevant evidence.
Cleary Joshua has never ran an investigation to the root cause of something.
Joshua sez he knows all about ID. And yet he is totally ignorant of the following:
Intelligent design begins with a seemingly innocuous question: Can objects, even if nothing is known about how they arose, exhibit features that reliably signal the action of an intelligent cause? - Wm. DembskiAnd it still remains that if you do not like the Design Inference you have all the power to refute it. All one has to do is step up and demonstrate that what ID says was intelligently designed can be produced by nature, i.e. blind and mindless processes. It isn't our fault that no one can do such a thing.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home