Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Wednesday, March 25, 2020

Faizal Ali- Dumbass

The anti-ID losers are such life rejects. And they don't care if they prove it every day. Case in point the strawman of the day:
Get some of the frozen E. coli from Richard Lenski’s LTEE.
Calculate the Complex Specified Information in the genomes of each generation.
Plot this over time and see whether CSI increases as a result of unguided evolutionary processes.
Seems so simple, but I’m pretty sure no ID Researcher has done this. Why not?
1- You are starting with the very CSI that needs to be explained in the first place.
2- And it isn't an increase of CSI. It is about producing CSI
3- How to determine if the evolutionary processes are unguided. ID is OK with organisms evolving by design.

But if you want simple, take a look at Lenski's LTEE. It shows us just how impotent evolutionary processes are with respect to producing CSI or IC. No new proteins have been produced.

Why haven't any evolutionary biologists taken non-flagellated E. coli, inserted the genes for a bacterial flagellum and see if one arises? What have evos ever done to support their nonsensical claims?


Post a Comment

<< Home