Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Saturday, December 22, 2018

Mikkel Rumraket is an Ignorant ass

Evolutionists are such a clueless lot. They think that blind and mindless process can do anything given what they think is enough time. Mikkel Rumraket thinks that there is enough time to duplicate many genes, get them new bunding sites, then change them in specific ways and finally organize them into a spliceosome!
The spliceosome is made mostly of duplicated proteins, with a core of RNA homologous to self-splicing group II introns, which are known to encode PRPF8-homologous proteins. What’s the problem?
The problem, moron, is there isn't enough time in the universe for blind and mindless processes to do that. However if you are talking Intelligent Design then you are right, no problem.

How do I know there isn't enough time in the universe? Waiting for TWO mutations :
For population sizes and mutation rates appropriate for Drosophila, a pair of mutations can switch off one transcription factor binding site and activate another on a timescale of several million years, even when we make the conservative assumption that the second mutation is neutral.
Just think how much longer it would take for duplicating many genes, building binding sites for them and then many specific mutations to change them.

Mikkel Rumraket is an ignorant twit


  • At 4:42 PM, Blogger Eugen said…

    Where do you find these clowns?

  • At 5:39 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    I believe he is the one who used to talk about the "right" mutations (wink, wink) when it comes to producing macroevolutionary events- meaning the formation of new body plans and new body parts.

    Voles didn't get no "right" mutations

    The "Skeptical" Zone- what they are skeptical of I am not sure. Look at what they just blindly accept as true. So they are "skeptical" of the reality which refutes their imaginationland- actually they are in flat-out denial of it.

  • At 8:18 PM, Blogger Eugen said…

    Yes, they should be skeptical of creativity of blind forces of nature

  • At 10:52 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    You would think. If they applied their skepticism evenly they definitely would be.


Post a Comment

<< Home