Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Monday, October 01, 2012

RichTARD Hughes, Choking on Geography

- - OK so we have established that Richie Hughes is ignorant of science. He is also ignorant on how to make a case for something. And now, just earlier today, he proved doesn't know anythiong about geography. Earth to Richie- Antarctica is the southernmost place on this planet and the Arctic is the nothernmost place on this planet. That means when I post about the record sea ice extent observed in ANTARCTICA I am NOT talking about the ARCTIC! And when YOU come along and post something about the ARCTIC in response to my post about the ANTARCTIC, it proves that you are a dishonest moron.


  • At 8:43 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Oh dear, Fatty. If you'd read the link (which you clearly didn't) you see both are mentioned, as I highlighted on your Tardgasm thread last night:;f=14;t=6647;st=5130#entry210817

    "...If we look at current Arctic and Antarctic sea ice extents compared to their 1979-2000 averages, Arctic sea ice is almost 50 percent below average whereas Antarctic sea ice is just between 5 and 10 percent above average.

    It’s not that we should dismiss the Antarctic difference from average. At some two standard deviations from (above) the mean, that signifies there’s just about a 5 percent chance of this happening (assuming a normal distribution). But the Arctic difference from average is in an entirely different universe statistically speaking, way, way beyond two standards deviations from (below) the mean.

    Moreover, the long term rate of decline in Arctic ice obliterates the converse rate of increase in the Antarctic. In August, for example, Arctic sea ice is declining at a rate of 10 percent per decade since 1979 compared to an increase of 0.6 percent per decade in the Antarctic."

    Epic fail - made funnier by you running off to start a new thread on it! Stick to sucking KF's scrotum, gimp. You're good at that.

  • At 9:12 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    The Arctic and Antarctic are two totally different places Richie. Only a dishonest moron would bring up the Arctic in a post about the Antarctic. And here you are...

    And no, I do not read your lnks because you are too stupid to properly post them.

  • At 10:19 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    You mean the author of the article who compares the the two regions, giving great context to the respective highs and lows?

    You're a fool. Stick to licking KF's arse.

  • At 12:06 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    You mean the author of the article who compares the the two regions, giving great context to the respective highs and lows?

    No, the author of the article was NOT responding to my post about ANTARCTICA.

    And about that context- let's see, the Antarctic sea ice is due to the temperature and the Arctic sea ice break up is due to storms.

    Not even the ame context, dumbass.

  • At 1:27 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "But NASA Parkinson’s said the same storm wouldn’t have had the same effect decades ago.

    “[The storm] likely wouldn’t have had as prominent an impact, because the ice wasn’t as vulnerable then as it is now,” Parkinson said."

    IDIOT. And a cherry picking one, at that. Go suck KF off some more, pathetic gimp. Show him some 'tunie'.

  • At 2:03 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    So IT WAS A STORM/STORMS just as I said.

    And decades ago we were still recovering from the little ice age.

    Warm earth good. Cold earth bad. Richie EvoTARD ignorant fuck


Post a Comment

<< Home