Over on his blog, David Kellogg, English professor at Northeastern U., has stated that I have physically threatened him.
However when pressed for an answer as to the alleged threat he clams up.
This is tha anti-ID way.
That is make an accusation but never substantiate it.
That is par for the course as their anti-ID position is totally lacking in substantiation.
I wonder how the administration at NU would feel if they knew one of their professors was posting false accusations on the internet?
"Only an intellectual coward- a guilty one at that- would take what I said as a threat."
ReplyDelete...and only a dishonest person would not admit they made a veiled threat in heat of the moment.
...And only a dishonest person would not admit they made a veiled threat in spur of the moment.
ReplyDelete...and only a dishonest person would not admit they made a veiled threat in heat of the moment.
ReplyDeleteAnd people with an IQ over 50 know the difference between an inferred threat and an actual threat- veiled or otherwise.
I'm still waiting for someone to demonstrate the threat I made.
Until then the alleged threat is all in their minds.
BTW there wasn't any "spur of the moment". I chose my words carefully.
My apologies- do you understand what "inferred" means?
ReplyDeleteIt does not mean that I made or implied a threat...
The following is an example of a threat:
ReplyDelete"The only appropriate response should involve some form of righteous fury, much butt-kicking, and the public firing of some teachers, many school board members, and vast numbers of sleazy, far-right politicians … I say, screw the polite words and careful rhetoric. It’s time for scientists to break out the steel-toed boots and brass knuckles, and get out there and hammer on the lunatics and idiots."- PZ Myers